Building a Gauss Rifle Science Toys | Science Blog | Log Out | Topics | Search
My Toys | Energy | Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Scitoys Message Board » Do you think this idea will work? » Building a Gauss Rifle « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Elijah
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, January 13, 2005 - 2:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

What about coiling insulated copper wire around the neodymium magnets to create a electromagnet making the steel balls go faster without adding more magnets
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Simon Quellen Field (sfield)
New member
Username: sfield

Post Number: 116
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Thursday, January 13, 2005 - 2:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Try it, and report your results here!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Elijah
Unregistered guest
Posted on Friday, January 14, 2005 - 10:44 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I bought the enamled wire yesterday, but I would like to know which is the greater factor in an elctromagnet Volts or Amps?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

marusushi
Unregistered guest
Posted on Friday, January 14, 2005 - 4:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I believe it is amps, but too many amps can fry the wire and destroy your magnets.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Elijah
Unregistered guest
Posted on Friday, January 14, 2005 - 6:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Thats what I thought but I wasnt Sure
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Simon Quellen Field (sfield)
New member
Username: sfield

Post Number: 121
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Friday, January 14, 2005 - 6:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Current and the number of turns of wire is what determines
the strength of a coil. But if you raise the voltage,
more current will go through the wire.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Elijah
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, January 17, 2005 - 10:23 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

thanx
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
 
Posted on Sunday, March 6, 2005 - 9:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

gauss rifle problem

coil wound around thin aluminum tube with steel rod bearing in it which becomes the em. one end of tube is open, other has a strong, factory build em which repels the bearing em. problem is that the rod bearing em is attracted to the factory em and wont always shoot out the tube. i can decrease the strength of the factory em and increase the other em to create launch power but it doesnt have the zoom i got out of one great, unsurpassed test due to above problem. should i adjust the timing of the pulses, strength, rod size, or do i have a different problem?

help would be greatly appreciated. :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bill nye
Unregistered guest
Posted on Sunday, March 6, 2005 - 9:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

if i used the principle of linear magnetic acceleration and used thousand of magnets and ball bearings, instead of the 4 shown in most sci-sites, would i eventually hit C(assuming the magnets/marbles don't desintagrate on impact)?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

lysdexia
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, March 7, 2005 - 1:09 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

disintegrate

Simon, shame on you for making him blow his money.

bill, no you wouldn't. And your ball wouldn't either.. at least that you could tell.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bill nye
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 - 5:02 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

all right, scrap light speed. how about mach. is that reasonable for a garage goal?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Simon Quellen Field (sfield)
Senior Member
Username: sfield

Post Number: 309
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Thursday, April 21, 2005 - 12:21 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

The 1 foot long Gauss Rifle in my book fires the steel ball
at about 15 feet per second. To double the speed to 30
feet per second, you would use 16 magnets on a 4 foot guide.
To double the speed again to 60 feet per second, you would
use 64 magnets on a 16 foot guide. You can keep going in
this fashion to get the speed you want.

An air rifle shoots BBs at between 500 to 1250 feet per second.
A center fire rifle usually exceeds 2000 feet per second, often
exceeding 3000 fps. To see how we can make a Gauss Rifle
that will achieve the velocities of a cheap rifle, we can construct
the following table:
magnets length speed
4 1 foot 15 fps
16 4 feet 30 fps
64 16 feet 60 fps
256 64 feet 120 fps
1024 256 feet 240 fps
4096 1024 feet 480 fps
16384 4096 feet 960 fps
65536 3.1 miles 1920 fps
262144 12.4 miles 3840 fps


So, with over a quarter of a million magnets, a half a million steel balls,
and 12 and a half miles of track, at an estimated cost of $786,432.00
we could construct a Gauss Rifle that would be the equal of a $150
rifle purchased at K-mart.

If you simply want to break the sound barrier, something around 10,000
magnets will probably get close.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MadScientist (madscientist)
Intermediate Member
Username: madscientist

Post Number: 22
Registered: 4-2005
Posted on Tuesday, April 26, 2005 - 9:20 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Whew. I'd LOVE to see THAT one fire! :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Billy Ward (Satan_imp2)
New member
Username: Satan_imp2

Post Number: 1
Registered: 5-2005
Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 9:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Just for inventive thought, what if the magnets were replaced with electromagnets; that briefly turned off after being struck?? In this idea would the end result not be amplyfied condiserably? After the initial strike, the electromagnet would turn off, and in turn, not bring about any drag to the next 2 bearings. Hence a greater accumulation of force.... I think.. Any thoughts?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MatthewColt22
Unregistered guest
Posted on Sunday, May 22, 2005 - 5:59 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

That would be one way to increse the exit velocity for sure, in fact i am also building a gauss rifle in a similar fassion, if you use iron rods that are formed into electromagnets and use them as your magnets and devise a way to turn them off once the magnets hit them, then yes you could have a very powerful gauss rifle on your hands. My origional plans dident include cutting the power, but i might try your idea, seems like i could work
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Simon Quellen Field (Sfield)
Senior Member
Username: Sfield

Post Number: 435
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Monday, May 23, 2005 - 1:11 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

You can turn on the spelling checker in your profile if you like.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mike Manchak
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, June 9, 2005 - 2:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

do you think small cylinders could replace the ball bearings in a tube for this type of mechanism, due to the increased contact area of the ends of the cylinders, would this make the kinetic energy transfer faster, resulting in a faster exit velocity? any responces would be greatly appriciated, thanks
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joel
Unregistered guest
Posted on Saturday, June 11, 2005 - 11:54 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

What if you used gravitational potential energy to assist in launching a projectile out of a gauss gun? For example, mounting it on an angle that just barely allows the magnets to hold the bearings in place.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Simon Quellen Field (Sfield)
Senior Member
Username: Sfield

Post Number: 478
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Saturday, June 11, 2005 - 3:19 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

The magnets can hold the balls vertically.
That's how I normally carry a loaded Gauss Rifle -- aimed at the ground.

The 4 magnet Gauss Rifle fires the ball at about 4.5 meters per second.
A steel ball dropped from a height accelerates at 9.8 meters per second
per second. It thus takes .46 seconds for a falling ball to reach a
velocity of 4.5 meters per second. To find the height it fell to reach
that speed, we multiply the square of the time by half the acceleration.
So .46 seconds times .46 seconds times 9.8 meters per second per second
divided by 2 is about 1.04 meters.

If you drop a steel ball from 1.04 meters, it will reach a speed of 4.5
meters per second before it hits the ground.

So, the Gauss Rifle adds the same energy as holding the ball about a meter
above the ground. You can do away with the Gauss Rifle by holding the
ball an additional meter above the ground.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
Unregistered guest
Posted on Saturday, June 11, 2005 - 6:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Looks like it'd still be of more fun designing nuclear particle projectors.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Simon Quellen Field (Sfield)
Senior Member
Username: Sfield

Post Number: 486
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Saturday, June 11, 2005 - 6:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

We have several on the web site already, but more nuclear particle projectors
are always good. Post your descriptions and pictures here.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
 
Posted on Wednesday, June 15, 2005 - 6:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Can anyone explain the transfer of energy and momentum between the magnet and the ball in the Gauss Rifle?
if the magnet is fixed, what would make the ball move? or must it have a small impulse (kick) and must not be completely fixed. can this be a factor for increasing speed (J=Ft)? can we eliminate the need for a second ball next to the one in ground state? does anyone have the momentum equation for the 4 magnet rifile or for Newton's Toy/pendulum? thanks
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
 
Posted From: 68.111.171.253
Posted on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 6:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

the magnet doesnt have to move. it transfers the energy to the ball bearings next to it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dhruv Chopra (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted From: 164.100.35.60
Posted on Friday, November 11, 2005 - 10:54 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi!
Can anyone guide me to how I can derive an equation for the acceleration or the velocity of the final ball?
Please. Thanks.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:
For those who have trouble spelling, the Google Toolbar (included in the Google Pack) can check and correct the spelling in your posts on this message board and others.

Renewable Energy

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration